Re: PDF build issue with 9.0 Alpha5
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PDF build issue with 9.0 Alpha5 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5261.1270245874@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PDF build issue with 9.0 Alpha5 ("Erik Rijkers" <er@xs4all.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: PDF build issue with 9.0 Alpha5
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
"Erik Rijkers" <er@xs4all.nl> writes: > This is CentOS 5.2, > yum list *jade* > Installed Packages > jadetex.noarch 3.12-13.1.1 installed > openjade.x86_64 1.3.2-27 installed Hmm. Some rooting about in Red Hat's CVS says that that should be practically indistinguishable from the 3.13 version shipping in current Fedora. In particular there is no real difference in jadetex.dtx in the two versions, so they should both eat about the same number of strings. Could you try this experiment: 1. make postgres-A4.tex-pdf 2. Edit the resulting postgres-A4.tex-pdf to insert a line \tracingstats=2 at the top. 3. make postgres-A4.pdf 4. In the resulting postgres-A4.log file, find the bit that looks like this, and send it to the list: Here is how much of TeX's memory you used: 245829 strings out of 245830 1743620 string characters out of 1810852 628334 words of memory out of 1500000 174597 multiletter control sequences out of 10000+200000 99198 words of font info for 149 fonts, out of 1200000 for 2000 645 hyphenation exceptions out of 8191 28i,13n,45p,1206b,3965s stack positions out of 5000i,500n,6000p,200000b,15000s It should be near but not quite at the end of the log (there will be some output from pdftex after it). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: