Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval)

On 10/17/2013 06:59 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Our project has a serious, chronic problem with giving new
> patch-submitters a bad experience, and this patch is a good example of
> that.  The ultimate result is that people go off to contribute to other
> projects where submissions are easier and the rules for what gets
> accepted are relatively transparent.

That may be true, but it depends on the contributor.  I would much
rather be told that my contribution is not up to snuff than what
happened on another project I recently tried to contribute to for the
first time.

A parser refactoring broke my code.  I reported it and it was promptly
fixed.  When the fix came up for review, I said it needed a regression
test to prevent it from happening again and I was told by the author
that such a test would be "flimsy" and it went on to be committed (by
that same guy) without one.  I'm undecided whether I'll be contributing
there any further.

The rigor here makes me want to try and try again.

-- 
Vik