Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 52600A35.5060907@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/17/2013 08:55 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I still think my previous proposal of increasing the defaults for >> work_mem and maintenance_work_mem by 4X would serve many more >> people well than it would serve poorly. I haven't heard anyone >> disagree with that notion. Does anyone disagree? Should we do >> it? > > I think that it makes sense to do that. Those are still reasonable > defaults for a machine with 2GB of RAM, maybe even with less. > We're talking about putting this only in a release that will come > out in 2014. How many machines used for a database server that new > will have less than that? A lot. A whole lot, more than what most people have in production with more than that. You are forgetting a very large segment of the population who run... VMs. Why don't we just have 3 default config files: 2GB memory 4GB memory 8GB memory Have initdb detect how much memory is available on the machine in TOTAL and pick the most appropriate. Joshua D. Drake -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579 PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc For my dreams of your image that blossoms a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: