Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval)

On 09/30/2013 01:47 PM, Vik Fearing wrote:
> Yes, I understand you are trying to help, and I appreciate it!  My
> opinion, and that of others as well from the original thread, is that
> this patch should either go in as is and break that one case, or not go
> in at all.  I'm fine with either (although clearly I would prefer it
> went in otherwise I wouldn't have written the patch).

I see this is marked as rejected in the commitfest app, but I don't see
any note about who did it or why.  I don't believe there is consensus
for rejection on this list. In fact I think the opposite is true.

May we have an explanation please from the person who rejected this
without comment?

-- 
Vik