Re: INSERT...ON DUPLICATE KEY LOCK FOR UPDATE
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: INSERT...ON DUPLICATE KEY LOCK FOR UPDATE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 525D8244.10909@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | INSERT...ON DUPLICATE KEY LOCK FOR UPDATE (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: INSERT...ON DUPLICATE KEY LOCK FOR UPDATE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/15/2013 08:11 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > I'm not saying "go implement MERGE". I'm saying, make the > insert-or-update operation a single statement, using some syntax TBD, > instead of requiring the use of a new insert statement that makes > invisible rows visible as a side effect, so that you can wrap that in > a CTE and feed it to an update statement. That's complex and, AFAICS, > unlike how any other database product handles this. Hmmm. Is the plan NOT to eventually get to a single-statement upsert? If not, then I'm not that keen on this feature. I can't say that anybody I know who's migrating from MySQL would use a 2-statement version of upsert; if they were prepared for that, then they'd be prepared to just rewrite their stuff as proper insert/updates anyway. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: