Re: Why there are no max_wal_receivers
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why there are no max_wal_receivers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5252C0CE.1060203@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why there are no max_wal_receivers (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why there are no max_wal_receivers
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 10/06/2013 09:53 PM, Amit Langote wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:02 PM, 高健 <luckyjackgao@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello : >> >> >> I found that for PG9.2.4, there is parameter max_wal_senders, >> >> But there is no parameter of max_wal_receivers. >> >> > > max_wal_senders is the maximum number of WAL sender processes that a > primary server can create in response to requests from the standby > servers. One WAL sender process is created on the primary server for > each standby which would running the corresponding WAL receiver. So > there is one-to-one mapping between WAL senders and WAL receivers > (standbys). Just to add, pg_basebackup also counts against the total of receivers: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/interactive/app-pgbasebackup.html > > -- > Amit Langote > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@gmail.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: