Re: Remaining 'needs review' patchs in July commitfest
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Remaining 'needs review' patchs in July commitfest |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 525.1438125267@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Remaining 'needs review' patchs in July commitfest (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> On 07/28/2015 11:01 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> Do we want to have this in src/test/modules or src/bin/pg_dump/t? >> Are we testing pg_dump here, or are we testing extensions? If the >> former, src/bin/pg_dump/t seems best. > All the tests are using pg_dump, but it is testing dumpable tables in > an extension. At this point I am not sure which one is better honestly > X/. ISTM we're testing pg_dump, but I don't especially want to clutter the pg_dump directory with the code for a dummy extension, so I'd vote for putting the extension code under src/test/modules. (Or you could hide it inside src/bin/pg_dump/t/, but that seems pretty weird too.) In the end though, this is the sort of thing we generally leave to the discretion of the responsible committer. I won't whinge too hard about whatever the decision is ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: