Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5245.1213062931@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > Agreed. I realize why we are not zeroing those bytes (for performance), > but can't we have the archiver zero those bytes before calling the > 'archive_command'? The archiver doesn't know any more about where the end-of-data is than the archive_command does. Moreover, the archiver doesn't know whether the archive_command cares. I think the separate module is a fine solution. It should also be pointed out that the whole thing becomes uninteresting if we get real-time log shipping implemented. So I see absolutely no point in spending time integrating pg_clearxlogtail now. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: