Re: PostgreSQL Timeline
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Timeline |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5239E08D.7000000@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL Timeline (damien clochard <damien@dalibo.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL Timeline
Re: PostgreSQL Timeline |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 09/18/2013 11:31 AM, MARK CALLAGHAN wrote: > Where are the references that Vertica is sort-of a PG fork and that > Paraccel is a PG fork? Quick searches of the interweb finds claims that > they are not. Not sure you need to bring doubt to the rest of the details > in an excellent slide deck. That depends on your definition of "fork". There are things which are forks which are 90% community Postgres code, and things which are 30% Postgres code. What percentage makes something a fork, and what doesn't, and why? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: