Re: News links, post 'em here
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: News links, post 'em here |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5231F5C3.4010207@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | News links, post 'em here (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: News links, post 'em here
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
> Just curious but, how do you think the community would react if EDB or > CMD was quoted the way Dalibo was quoted? Consider the following: > > From: > http://www.journaldunet.com/developpeur/outils/postgresql-9-3-big-data-0913.shtml > > > " PostgreSQL 9.3 is placed under the sign of interoperability with > other storage engines, whether others such as Oracle RDBMS or NoSQL > databases, "says Dalibo." > > " PostgreSQL 9.3 is placed under the sign of interoperability with > other storage engines, whether others such as Oracle RDBMS or NoSQL > databases, "says Command Prompt. " What's the problem with that? Seems OK to me. Heck, there's three companies quoted in the release itself. And I'm quoted in a number of articles, and even if my title isn't used, it doesn't take much of a search to lead to PGX. In the past, we've coordinated with EDB and Heroku press releases around release time as well. I didn't do that this year because coordinating with the larger companies is a lot of effort and I didn't have the energy/time, not because it's inherently a bad idea. If the PostgreSQL Project was a proprietary company, we'd be coordinating major release announcements with all of our major "partners" to have them announce support/products as well, for maximum impact. PR-wise, our relationship with distributors and service companies isn't that different. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: