Re: Reasons for choosing one execution plan over another?
От | Giuseppe Broccolo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reasons for choosing one execution plan over another? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5230A08A.7050001@2ndquadrant.it обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Reasons for choosing one execution plan over another? (Mikkel Lauritsen <renard@tala.dk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reasons for choosing one execution plan over another?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Il 11/09/2013 13:16, Mikkel Lauritsen ha scritto: > Hi all, > > I have a number of Postgres 9.2.4 databases with the same schema but with > slightly different contents, running on small servers that are basically > alike (8-16 GB ram). > I think that your answer can be found in your statement "slightly different contents". Planner choices query execution plans basing on statistics obtained during ANALYSE operations, including the autovacuum. In this way, Planner can decide which execution plan is the most suitable. Different content of values in your table could correspond to different statistical distribution of values in your columns and of rows in your tables, bringing to different choices of the Planner. Execution times can be very different, also by factor 10-100. There is a parameter (stat_target) which set the "selectivity" of statistical samples of a table. Maybe, but it's not necessarily true, you could obtain more comparable execution times for the two execution plans changing it, probably increasing them. Giuseppe. -- Giuseppe Broccolo - 2ndQuadrant Italy PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support giuseppe.broccolo@2ndQuadrant.it | www.2ndQuadrant.it
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: