Re: VALIDATE CONSTRAINT
От | Vik Fearing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: VALIDATE CONSTRAINT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5224AF98.9000905@dalibo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: VALIDATE CONSTRAINT (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: VALIDATE CONSTRAINT
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On 09/02/2013 04:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com> writes: >> Is there a reason, besides simple oversight, that commit >> 073d7cb513f5de44530f4bdbaaa4b5d4cce5f984 was not backpatched? >> I think it needs to be. > AFAICS, it was. > > Author: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> > Branch: master [073d7cb51] 2013-06-18 12:09:39 +0100 > Branch: REL9_3_STABLE [0ae1bf8c1] 2013-06-18 12:10:10 +0100 > Branch: REL9_2_STABLE [20a562f91] 2013-06-18 12:00:32 +0100 > Branch: REL9_1_STABLE [be039d4b2] 2013-06-18 12:05:48 +0100 That does seem to indicate it was. But it doesn't seem they made it to the website: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-altertable.html http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/sql-altertable.html -- Vik
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: