Re: Regression testing for psql
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Regression testing for psql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5223.1274920236@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Regression testing for psql (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Regression testing for psql
Re: Regression testing for psql |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes: > * alvherre (alvherre@commandprompt.com) wrote: >> (And if we want something like this, I think we should not have a single >> huge file for the complete test, but a set of smaller files. I'd even >> put the bunch in src/bin/psql/regress rather than the main regress dir.) > The actual set of tests is rather small. The output is large, but > that's just because we have alot of things in the catalog. It sounds to me like this is going to be like the rules regression test writ large; specifically the part that dumps out view definitions for all the built-in views. And that, quite frankly, has been a huge maintenance burden and AFAIR has never once had any redeeming social value in terms of catching a bug. If you're testing things that way, don't. There might be some value in psql backslash command tests that are designed to depend on just one or a few tables (or other appropriate objects). Dumping large fractions of the catalogs will just be a net loss. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: