On 28.08.2013 20:21, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas<hlinnakangas@vmware.com> writes:
>> So, my plan is to apply the attached non-locked-tas-spin-x86_64.patch to
>> master. But I would love to get feedback from people running different
>> x86_64 hardware.
>
> Surely this patch should update the existing comment at line 209? Or at
> least point out that a non-locked test in TAS_SPIN is not the same as a
> non-locked test in tas() itself.
Committed with some comment changes. I also added a note to the 32-bit
x86 implementation, suggesting we probably should do the same there,
no-one's just gotten around to do the testing.
- Heikki