Re: pg_system_identifier()
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_system_identifier() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 521A8985.2040509@nasby.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_system_identifier() (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_system_identifier()
Re: pg_system_identifier() |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/23/13 11:23 AM, Greg Stark wrote: > This doesn't generate a unique id. You could back up a standby and restore it and point it at the original master and endup with two standbies with the same id. If you want to enforce something unique throughout a cluster, I think we're stuck with having the cluster communicate IDsacross an entire cluster. AFAIK that's how both Slony and londiste 3 do it. I think it's also noteworthy that Slony and londiste both rely on the user specifying node identifiers. They don't try tobe magic about it. I think there's 2 advantages there: - Code is simpler - Users can choose a naming schema that makes sense for them -- Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect jim@nasby.net 512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: