Re: Backup throttling
| От | Boszormenyi Zoltan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Backup throttling |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 521260D7.4080401@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Backup throttling (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Backup throttling
Re: Backup throttling |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
2013-08-19 19:20 keltezéssel, Andres Freund írta: > Hi, > > On 2013-07-24 09:20:52 +0200, Antonin Houska wrote: >> Hello, >> the purpose of this patch is to limit impact of pg_backup on running server. >> Feedback is appreciated. > Based on a quick look it seems like you're throttling on the receiving > side. Is that a good idea? Especially over longer latency links, TCP > buffering will reduce the effect on the sender side considerably. > > Greetings, > > Andres Freund Throttling on the sender side requires extending the syntax of BASE_BACKUP and maybe START_REPLICATION so both can be throttled but throttling is still initiated by the receiver side. Maybe throttling the walsender is not a good idea, it can lead to DoS via disk space shortage. Best regards, Zoltán Böszörményi -- ---------------------------------- Zoltán Böszörményi Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH Gröhrmühlgasse 26 A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de http://www.postgresql.at/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: