Re: Character set conversion
От | Daniel T. Staal |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Character set conversion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 52114.173.8.4.46.1216863418.squirrel@MageHandbook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Character set conversion (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
On Mon, July 21, 2008 10:16 am, Tom Lane wrote: > It wouldn't be too hard if you don't mind running a custom Postgres > build; but if you do, then the best answer might be to cannibalize one of > the existing encoding names and just replace its conversion procedures. Actually, I'd recommend not doing that. Instead, put in your encoding as a new encoding, and send a diff of your changes to the Postgres team. I bet next release it would be a supported encoding, and you would be able to upgrade without any issues... Daniel T. STaal --------------------------------------------------------------- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. ---------------------------------------------------------------
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: