Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.
От | Andrey Lepikhov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 520f3426-466c-0aa2-1bae-6188466203db@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes. (Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/6/21 14:49, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 6:55 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 6:27 PM Andrey Lepikhov >> <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >>> On 11/5/21 12:24, Etsuro Fujita wrote: >> >>>>> -> Append (actual rows=3000 loops=1) >>>>> -> Async Foreign Scan on f1 (actual rows=0 loops=1) >>>>> -> Async Foreign Scan on f2 (actual rows=0 loops=1) >>>>> -> Foreign Scan on f3 (actual rows=3000 loops=1) >>>>> >>>>> Here we give preference to the synchronous scan. Why? >>>> >>>> This would be expected behavior, and the reason is avoid performance >>>> degradation; you might think it would be better to execute the async >>>> Foreign Scan nodes more aggressively, but it would require >>>> waiting/polling for file descriptor events many times, which is >>>> expensive and might cause performance degradation. I think there is >>>> room for improvement, though. >>> Yes, I agree with you. Maybe you can add note in documentation on >>> async_capable, for example: >>> "... Synchronous and asynchronous scanning strategies can be mixed by >>> optimizer in one scan plan of a partitioned table or an 'UNION ALL' >>> command. For performance reasons, synchronous scans executes before the >>> first of async scan. ..." >> >> +1 But I think this is an independent issue, so I think it would be >> better to address the issue separately. > > I think that since postgres-fdw.sgml would be for users rather than > developers, unlike fdwhandler.sgml, it would be better to explain this > more in a not-too-technical way. So how about something like this? > > Asynchronous execution is applied even when an Append node contains > subplan(s) executed synchronously as well as subplan(s) executed > asynchronously. In that case, if the asynchronous subplans are ones > executed using postgres_fdw, tuples from the asynchronous subplans are > not returned until after at least one synchronous subplan returns all > tuples, as that subplan is executed while the asynchronous subplans > are waiting for the results of queries sent to foreign servers. This > behavior might change in a future release. Good, this text is clear for me. -- regards, Andrey Lepikhov Postgres Professional
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: