Re: JSON/SQL: jsonpath: incomprehensible error message
От | Erik Rijkers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: JSON/SQL: jsonpath: incomprehensible error message |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 520a503e-8c37-d09e-b887-22abed0c0be4@xs4all.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: JSON/SQL: jsonpath: incomprehensible error message (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: JSON/SQL: jsonpath: incomprehensible error message
Re: JSON/SQL: jsonpath: incomprehensible error message |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Op 29-06-2022 om 15:00 schreef Amit Kapila: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 8:46 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: >> >> On 2022-06-26 Su 11:44, Erik Rijkers wrote: >>> JSON/SQL jsonpath >>> >>> For example, a jsonpath string with deliberate typo 'like_regexp' >>> (instead of 'like_regex'): >>> >>> select js >>> from (values (jsonb '{}')) as f(js) >>> where js @? '$ ? (@ like_regexp "^xxx")'; >>> >>> ERROR: syntax error, unexpected IDENT_P at or near " " of jsonpath input >>> LINE 1: ...s from (values (jsonb '{}')) as f(js) where js @? '$ ? (@ >>> li... >>> >>> Both 'IDENT_P' and 'at or near " "' seem pretty useless. >>> > removing this. One thing that is not clear to me is why OP sees an > acceptable message (ERROR: syntax error, unexpected invalid token at > or near "=" of jsonpath input) for a similar query in 14? To mention that was perhaps unwise of me because The IDENT_P (or more generally, *_P) messages can be provoked on 14 too. I just thought 'invalid token' might be a better message because 'token' gives a more direct association with 'errors during parsing' which I assume is the case here. IDENT_P or ANY_P convey exactly nothing. Erik
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: