On 09.01.25 15:53, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
>> The second patch contemplates raising the minimum required flex version,
>> but what to?
>
> Meh, let's just rip out the version check. It's no longer very
> relevant. Nobody is going to be using anything older than 2.5.35.
> While 2.5.35 produces compile warnings, it does still work, so
> rejecting it with a changed version check seems unnecessary.
This has been done.