Re: [v9.4] row level security

On 7/23/13 12:10 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Apparently it's a little much for experienced reviewers to chew on, too,
> since I've been trying to get someone to review it since the beginning
> of the Commitfest.

It's more than the available experienced reviewers are willing to chew 
on fully as volunteers.  The reward for spending review time is pretty 
low right now.

> While I understand the call for "resources", this is a bit unfair to
> KaiGai, who has put in his time reviewing other people's patches.

If you read Dean Rasheed's comments, it's obvious he put a useful amount 
of work into his review suggestions.  It is not the case here that 
KaiGai worked on a review and got nothing in return.  Unfortunately that 
has happened to this particular patch before, but the community did a 
little better this time.

The goal of the CF is usually to reach one of these outcomes for every 
submission:

-The submission is ready for commit
-The submission needs improvement in X

Review here went far enough to identify an X to be improved.  It was a 
big enough issue that a rewrite is needed, commit at this time isn't 
possible, and now KaiGai has something we hope is productive he can 
continue working on.  That's all we can really promise here--that if we 
say something isn't ready for commit yet, that there's some feedback as 
to why.

I would have preferred to see multiple X issues identified here, given 
that we know there has to be more than just the one in a submission of 
this size.  The rough fairness promises of the CommitFest seem satisfied 
to me though.

-- 
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg@2ndQuadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com