Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51EE00DA.2000809@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/22/13 10:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: >> Remove unused targets from plan: Alvaro? (He reviewed it already) > > Really I should do that one, but it seems like all my available cycles > have been going into bug fixing lately :-( I just put you down as the committer on it, given Alvaro waved that way too. A further look at recently ALTER OPERATOR FAMILY changes shows that Robert has been working on those quite a bit. I'm putting him down as the committer on this last one. If the CF drags on a bit due to committer time being spent on bugs, given the date here I think that's OK. I would put next week as a loose target for finishing these off. I worry a lot less about committers keeping to their schedules than when there are 50 regular contributors still moving around. That leaves only 1 patch where I have no idea who will commit it: access to calls stack from GET DIAGNOSTICS statement -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: