Re: [HACKERS] getting rid of SnapshotNow
От | Hiroshi Inoue |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] getting rid of SnapshotNow |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51E95FF7.4000004@tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | getting rid of SnapshotNow (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] getting rid of SnapshotNow
|
Список | pgsql-odbc |
(2013/07/18 21:46), Robert Haas wrote: > There seems to be a consensus that we should try to get rid of > SnapshotNow entirely now that we have MVCC catalog scans, so I'm > attaching two patches that together come close to achieving that goal: ... > With that done, the only remaining uses of SnapshotNow in our code > base will be in currtid_byreloid() and currtid_byrelname(). So far no > one on this list has been able to understand clearly what the purpose > of those functions is, so I'm copying this email to pgsql-odbc in case > someone there can provide more insight. If I were a betting man, I'd > bet that they are used in contexts where the difference between > SnapshotNow and SnapshotSelf wouldn't matter there, either. Using SnapshotSelf instead of SnapshotNow for currtid_ () wouldn't matter. regards, Hiroshi Inoue
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: