Re: Fix pgstattuple/pgstatindex to use regclass-type as the argument
От | Satoshi Nagayasu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fix pgstattuple/pgstatindex to use regclass-type as the argument |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51E4E461.1050702@uptime.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fix pgstattuple/pgstatindex to use regclass-type as the argument (Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fix pgstattuple/pgstatindex to use regclass-type as the argument
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Rushabh, (2013/07/16 14:58), Rushabh Lathia wrote: > Hello Satoshi, > > I assigned myself for the reviewer of this patch. Issue status is waiting on > author. Thank you for picking it up. > Now looking at the discussion under the thread it seems like we are waiting > for the suggestion for the new function name, right ? Yes. > I am wondering why actually we need new name ? Can't we just overload the > same function and provide two version of the functions ? I think the major reason is to avoid some confusion with old and new function arguments. My thought here is that having both arguments (text and regclass) for each function is a good choice to clean up interfaces with keeping the backward-compatibility. > In the last thread Fujii just did the same for pg_relpages and it seems > like an > good to go approach, isn't it ? Am I missing anything here ? I just posted a revised patch to handle the issue in three functions of the pgstattuple module. Please take a look. Regards, -- Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga@uptime.jp> Uptime Technologies, LLC. http://www.uptime.jp
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: