Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51E05677.6040703@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/12/2013 10:49 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > On 07/12/2013 01:28 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Josh Berkus wrote: >> >>> -- a couple of compromise proposals were made: >>> >>> a) that reviewers who do actual code modification of the patch get >>> credited on the feature, and those who just review it get credited at >>> the bottom of the release notes, or >>> > > I'd probably say "substantial" or "non-trivial", but otherwise +1 Right cause if a reviewer ends up writing (or cleaning up) all the docs, I would say they deserve very close to equal credit. As an example. JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579 PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc For my dreams of your image that blossoms a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: