Re: LATERAL quals revisited
От | Antonin Houska |
---|---|
Тема | Re: LATERAL quals revisited |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51D59EC3.2020902@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: LATERAL quals revisited (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: LATERAL quals revisited
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/03/2013 08:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Another possibility would be to keep the optimization, but disable it in > queries that use LATERAL. I don't much care for that though --- seems > too Rube Goldbergish, and in any case I have a lot less faith in the > whole concept now than I had before I started digging into this issue. > > Thoughts? > I noticed EXPLAIN in some regression tests. So if they all pass after removal of this optimization, it might indicate that it was really insignificant. But alternatively it may just be a lack of focus on this feature in the test queries. Digging for (non-LATERAL) queries or rather patterns where the ph_may_need optimization clearly appears to be important sounds to me like a good SQL exercise, but I'm afraid I won't have time for it in the next few days. //Antonin Houska (Tony)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: