Re: "pg_ctl promote" exit status
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "pg_ctl promote" exit status |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51D18E0B.10500@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "pg_ctl promote" exit status (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: "pg_ctl promote" exit status
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/28/13 10:50 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:46:32AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On 1/26/13 4:44 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: >>> You are right. Had I read a little further down, it seems that the >>> exit status should actually be 7. >> >> 7 is OK for "not running", but what should we use when the server is not >> in standby mode? Using the idempotent argument that we are discussing >> for the stop action, promoting a server that is not a standby should be >> a noop and exit successfully. Not sure if that is what we want, though. > > I looked at all the LSB return codes listed here and mapped them to > pg_ctl error situations: > > https://refspecs.linuxbase.org/LSB_3.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/iniscrptact.html > > Patch attached. I did not touch the start/stop return codes. Approximately none of these changes seem correct to me. For example, why is failing to open the PID file 6, or failing to start the server 7?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: