Re: Support for RANGE ... PRECEDING windows in OVER
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Support for RANGE ... PRECEDING windows in OVER |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51D10BF2.6040701@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Support for RANGE ... PRECEDING windows in OVER (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Support for RANGE ... PRECEDING windows in OVER
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/30/2013 08:54 PM, ian link wrote: > I found some time and I think I am up to speed now. I finally figured out > how to add new operator strategies and made a little test operator for > myself. > > It seems pretty clear that assuming '+' and '-' are addition and > subtraction is a bad idea. I don't think it would be too tricky to add > support for new operator strategies. Andrew Gierth suggested calling these > new strategies "offset -" and "offset +", which I think describes it pretty > well. I assigned the operator itself to be "@+" and "@-" but that can > obviously be changed. If this sounds like a good path to you guys, I will > go ahead and implement the operators for the appropriate types. Please let > me know if I am misunderstanding something - I am still figuring stuff out > :) > > Aside from the opclass stuff, there were some other important issues > mentioned with the original RANGE support. I think I will address those > after the opclass stuff is done. Are these things you plan to get done this week, or for next CommitFest? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: