Re: plpython implementation
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: plpython implementation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51D020D9.6060000@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | plpython implementation (Szymon Guz <mabewlun@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: plpython implementation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/30/2013 07:49 AM, Szymon Guz wrote: > I'm reading through plperl and plpython implementations and I don't > understand the way they work. > > Comments for plperl say that there are two interpreters (trusted and > untrusted) for each user session, and they are stored in a hash. > > Plpython version looks quite different, there is no such global hash > with interpreters, there is just a pointer to an interpreter and one > global function _PG_init, which runs once (but per session, user, or > what?). > > I'm just wondering how a plpython implementation should look like. We > need another interpreter, but PG_init function is run once, should it > then create two interpreters on init, or should we let this function > do nothing and create a proper interpreter in the first call of > plpython(u) function for current session? > > python does not any any sort of reliable sandbox, so there is no plpython, only plpythonu - hence only one interpreter per backend is needed. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: