Re: SMH on Salesforce-Oracle
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SMH on Salesforce-Oracle |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51CC9CE9.1000209@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SMH on Salesforce-Oracle (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 6/26/13 11:29 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > The issue with Salesforce is the length of the deal --- 9 years. It is > hard to call that just "maintain a relationship with Oracle". There are two major problems with this thinking: -It assumes there is only one Oracle application inside of Salesforce. Just at a very high level, in addition to their namesake CRM application there's also their cloud database at http://database.com/ and that announcement was filled with cloudy stuff. -A gigantic database installation can easily take 9 years to migrate to a new platform, before every instance is converted. The Salesforce/Oracle announcement reeks of co-marketing announcement. It isn't necessarily connected to their infrastructure plans at all. The real about-face going on there is Oracle's changed stance on the whole "cloud database" concept. That topic is a much more interesting one for this advocacy list to me. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: