Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51CC6615.8080909@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/27/2013 12:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:50:07AM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote: >>> It could be pretty satisfactory to have a simple listing, in the >>> release notes, of the set of reviewers. That's a lot less >>> bookkeeping than tracking this for each and every change. >> Adding the names to each release note item is not a problem; the >> problem is the volume of names that overwhelms the release note text. If >> we went that direction, I predict we would just remove _all_ names from >> the release notes. > Yeah. Keep in mind that the overwhelming majority of the audience for > the release notes doesn't actually give a darn who implemented what. Maybe we should have a Kudos / Bragging rights wiki page, with a table something like this: Release Feature Name Principal Author(s) Contributing Author(s) Code Reviewer(s) Tester(s) Constructing it going backwards would be an interesting task :-) cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: