Re: Bugfix and new feature for PGXS
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bugfix and new feature for PGXS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51C1BDF9.5010004@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bugfix and new feature for PGXS (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bugfix and new feature for PGXS
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/19/2013 10:06 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 6/19/13 5:55 AM, Cédric Villemain wrote: >> Le mercredi 19 juin 2013 04:48:11, Peter Eisentraut a écrit : >>> On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 15:52 +0200, Cédric Villemain wrote: >>>> This allows for example to install hstore header and be able to >>>> include them >>>> >>>> in another extension like that: >>>> # include "contrib/hstore/hstore.h" >>> That's not going to work. hstore's header file is included as #include >>> "hstore.h" (cf. hstore source code). Having it included under different >>> paths in different contexts will be a mess. >> OK. >> At the beginning I though of putting headers in include/contrib but feared >> that some header may have the same name. >> If you think that it is suitable, I can do that ? (and include the clean: >> recipe that I missed on the first shot) > I don't think there is any value in moving the contrib header files around. > > > What are they going to be used for anyway? I rubbed up against this not too long ago. Things will blow up if you use stuff from the module and the module isn't already loaded. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: