Re: pluggable compression support
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pluggable compression support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51BBCB43.5060207@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pluggable compression support (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/14/2013 06:56 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On 2013-06-14 17:35:02 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: >>> >>>> No. I think as long as we only have pglz and one new algorithm (even if >>>> that is lz4 instead of the current snappy) we should just always use the >>>> new algorithm. Unless I missed it nobody seemed to have voiced a >>>> contrary position? >>>> For testing/evaluation the guc seems to be sufficient. >>> >>> Then it's not "pluggable", is it? It's "upgradable compression >>> support", if anything. Which is fine, but let's not confuse people. >> >> The point is that it's pluggable on the storage level in the sense of >> that several different algorithms can coexist and new ones can >> relatively easily added. >> That part is what seems to have blocked progress for quite a while >> now. So fixing that seems to be the interesting thing. >> >> I am happy enough to do the work of making it configurable if we want it >> to be... But I have zap interest of doing it and throw it away in the >> end because we decide we don't need it. > > I don't think we need it. I think what we need is to decide is which > algorithm is legally OK to use. And then put it in. > > In the past, we've had a great deal of speculation about that legal > question from people who are not lawyers. Maybe it would be valuable > to get some opinions from people who ARE lawyers. Tom and Heikki both > work for real big companies which, I'm guessing, have substantial > legal departments; perhaps they could pursue getting the algorithms of > possible interest vetted. Or, I could try to find out whether it's > possible do something similar through EnterpriseDB. We have IP legal representation through Software in the Public interest who pretty much specializes in this type of thing. Should I follow up? If so, I need a summary of the exact question including licenses etc. JD > -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579 PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc For my dreams of your image that blossoms a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: