Re: another error perhaps to be enhanced
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: another error perhaps to be enhanced |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51BB5CA3.2060406@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: another error perhaps to be enhanced (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/14/2013 11:01 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> Now, with the error previously shown, which one_idx needs to be reindexed? > > Well, you didn't show an actual error message. ERROR: index "foo_idx" Is not an error message? Granted I didn't show the whole error message but my point is, it should ALWAYS be fully qualified. > But if you "\set > VERBOSITY verbose" within psql while connected to a 9.3 server, you'll > get fully qualified details of the constraint blamed for the error, if > any. Example: > > postgres=# insert into a(a, b) values (3, 'test'); > ERROR: 23505: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "a_pkey" > DETAIL: Key (a)=(3) already exists. > SCHEMA NAME: public > TABLE NAME: a > CONSTRAINT NAME: a_pkey > LOCATION: _bt_check_unique, nbtinsert.c:398 > > I was looking in the logs. JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579 PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc For my dreams of your image that blossoms a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: