Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51A4DDB1.10605@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | preserving forensic information when we freeze (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/28/2013 06:21 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > As a general statement, I view this work as something that is likely > needed no matter which one of the "remove freezing" approaches that > have been proposed we choose to adopt. It does not fix anything in > and of itself, but it (hopefully) removes an objection to the entire > line of inquiry. Agreed. I have some ideas on how to reduce the impact of freezing as well (of course), and the description of your approach certainly seems to benefit them, especially as it removes the whole "forensic information" objection. One question though: if we're not removing the xmin, how do we know the maximum xid to which we can prune clog? I can imagine several ways given your approach. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: