Re: Parallel Sort
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Parallel Sort |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 519FADC1.4050908@nasby.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Parallel Sort (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Parallel Sort
Re: Parallel Sort |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/13/13 9:28 AM, Noah Misch wrote: > It would be great if one client session could take advantage of multiple CPU > cores. EnterpriseDB wishes to start the trek into this problem space for 9.4 > by implementing parallel internal (i.e. not spilling to disk) sort. This > touches on a notable subset of the infrastructure components we'll need for > parallel general query. My intent is to map out the key design topics, hear > about critical topics I hadn't considered, and solicit feedback on the quality > of the high-level plan. Full designs for key pieces will come later. Have you considered GPU-based sorting? I know there's been discussion in the past. To me, the biggest advantage of GPU sorting is that most of the concerns you've laid out go away; a backend that needs tosort just throws data at the GPU to do the actual sorting; all the MVCC issues and what not remain within the scope ofa single backend. -- Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect jim@nasby.net 512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: