Re: [ODBC] ODBC constructs
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [ODBC] ODBC constructs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 519B14E7.3010806@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ODBC constructs (Dev Kumkar <devdas.kumkar@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [ODBC] ODBC constructs
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 21.05.2013 08:11, Dev Kumkar wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Atri Sharma<atri.jiit@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> If you wish to work in C,then,I would suggest libpq.I would wait for more >> replies on this,as I have little knowledge >> about psqlODBC. >> > > Thanks for the comments. Yes objective is to work in C and found libpq > useful but am not sure about psqlODBC. > It would be really great to get comments from community here regarding > comparison between both of them and also performance perspective. Based on > my reading so far libpq is good from performance perspective. libpq is generally-speaking better than psqlodbc. The advantage of ODBC is that if you have a suitable driver, you can connect to other DBMS' as well, while libpq will only work with PostgreSQL. Unless you need such portability, go with libpq. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: