Re: Deploying PostgreSQL on CentOS with SSD and Hardware RAID
| От | Toby Corkindale |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Deploying PostgreSQL on CentOS with SSD and Hardware RAID |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 519AD130.6050807@strategicdata.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Deploying PostgreSQL on CentOS with SSD and Hardware RAID (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 21/05/13 00:16, Merlin Moncure wrote: > On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Toby Corkindale > <toby.corkindale@strategicdata.com.au> wrote: >> On 11/05/13 02:25, Merlin Moncure wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Evan D. Hoffman >>> <evandhoffman@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Not sure of your space requirements, but I'd think a RAID 10 of 8x or >>>> more >>>> Samsung 840 Pro 256/512 GB would be the best value. Using a simple >>>> mirror >>>> won't get you the reliability that you want since heavy writing will burn >>>> the drives out over time, and if you're writing the exact same content to >>>> both drives, they could likely fail at the same time. Regardless of the >>>> underlying hardware you should still follow best practices for >>>> provisioning >>>> disks, and raid 10 is the way to go. I don't know what your budget is >>>> though. Anyway, mirrored SSD will probably work fine, but I'd avoid >>>> using >>>> just two drives for the reasons above. I'd suggest at least testing RAID >>>> 5 >>>> or something else to spread the load around. Personally, I think the >>>> ideal >>>> configuration would be a RAID 10 of at least 8 disks plus 1 hot spare. >>>> The >>>> Samsung 840 Pro 256 GB are frequently $200 on sale at Newegg. YMMV but >>>> they >>>> are amazing drives. >>> >>> >>> Samsung 840 has no power loss protection and is therefore useless for >>> database use IMO unless you don't care about data safety and/or are >>> implementing redundancy via some other method (say, by synchronous >>> replication). >> >> >> >> I believe the original poster was referring to the "840 Pro" model; that >> model does include a "supercap" for power loss protection. > > got a source for that? I couldn't verify that after some googling. I'm sorry, I really thought they had made it onto my list of candidates that included supercaps.. now I'm checking again, I can't find any evidence to support that claim either. I must have confused them in my mind with another drive. Sorry about that, and thanks for checking. -Toby
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: