Re: Deploying PostgreSQL on CentOS with SSD and Hardware RAID
От | Toby Corkindale |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Deploying PostgreSQL on CentOS with SSD and Hardware RAID |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5199776F.6060708@strategicdata.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Deploying PostgreSQL on CentOS with SSD and Hardware RAID (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Deploying PostgreSQL on CentOS with SSD and Hardware RAID
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 11/05/13 02:25, Merlin Moncure wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Evan D. Hoffman > <evandhoffman@gmail.com> wrote: >> Not sure of your space requirements, but I'd think a RAID 10 of 8x or more >> Samsung 840 Pro 256/512 GB would be the best value. Using a simple mirror >> won't get you the reliability that you want since heavy writing will burn >> the drives out over time, and if you're writing the exact same content to >> both drives, they could likely fail at the same time. Regardless of the >> underlying hardware you should still follow best practices for provisioning >> disks, and raid 10 is the way to go. I don't know what your budget is >> though. Anyway, mirrored SSD will probably work fine, but I'd avoid using >> just two drives for the reasons above. I'd suggest at least testing RAID 5 >> or something else to spread the load around. Personally, I think the ideal >> configuration would be a RAID 10 of at least 8 disks plus 1 hot spare. The >> Samsung 840 Pro 256 GB are frequently $200 on sale at Newegg. YMMV but they >> are amazing drives. > > Samsung 840 has no power loss protection and is therefore useless for > database use IMO unless you don't care about data safety and/or are > implementing redundancy via some other method (say, by synchronous > replication). I believe the original poster was referring to the "840 Pro" model; that model does include a "supercap" for power loss protection. -Toby
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: