Re: Fast promotion failure
| От | Heikki Linnakangas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Fast promotion failure |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 51909998.3010202@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Fast promotion failure (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Fast promotion failure
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 13.05.2013 06:07, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Monday, May 13, 2013 5:54 AM Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: >> Heikki said in the fist message in this thread that he suspected >> the cause of the failure he had seen to be wrong TLI on whitch >> checkpointer runs. Nevertheless, the patch you suggested for me >> looks fixing it. Moreover (one of?) the failure from the same >> cause looks fixed with the patch. > > There were 2 problems: > 1. There was some issue in walsender logic due to which after promotion in > some cases it hits assertion or error > 2. During fast promotion, checkpoint gets created with wrong TLI > > He has provided 2 different patches > fix-standby-promotion-assert-fail-2.patch and > fast-promotion-quick-fix.patch. > Among 2, he has already committed fix-standby-promotion-assert-fail-2.patch > (http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=2ffa66f49 > 75c99e52984f7ee81b47d137b5b4751) That's correct. >> Is the point of this discussion that the patch may leave out some >> glich about timing of timeline-related changing and Heikki saw an >> egress of that? > > AFAIU, the committed patch has some gap in overall scenario which is the > fast promotion issue. Right, the fast promotion issue is still there. Just to get us all on the same page again: Does anyone see a problem with a fresh git checkout, with the fast-promotion-quick-fix.patch applied? (http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/51894942.4080500@vmware.com). If you do, please speak up. As far as I know, the already-committed patch, together with fast-promotion-quick-fix.patch, should fix all known issues (*). I haven't committed a fix for the issue I reported in this thread, because I'm not 100% on what the right fix for it would be. fast-promotion-quick-fix.patch seems to do the trick, but at least the comments need to be updated, and I'm not sure if there some related corner cases that it doesn't handle. Simon? (*) Well, almost. This one is still pending: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqRhuCuuD012GCB_tAAFrixx2WioN_zfXQcvLuRab8DN2g@mail.gmail.com - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: