Re: Terminology issue: suffix tree
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Terminology issue: suffix tree |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 518A3BEB.1010801@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Terminology issue: suffix tree (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Terminology issue: suffix tree
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06.05.2013 14:10, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Alexander Korotkov<aekorotkov@gmail.com>wrote: >> In suffix tree we insert every suffix of source string into the tree. >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffix_tree >> Actually opclass implemented radix tree or patricia tree. >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radix_tree >> Likely we need a patch to rename it in all the places it mentioned. > > Patch is attached. Thanks, committed. > Apparently, we have same issue in contrib/unaccent. Yeah. The data structure in contrib/unaccent seems to be a plain old trie, rather than a radix trie, though. According to wikipedia at least, the difference is that in a radix tree, the edges are labeled with sequences of elements, rather than single elements. Want to patch that too? - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: