Re: Remaining beta blockers
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Remaining beta blockers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5187CC2A.6070607@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Remaining beta blockers (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/06/2013 08:17 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Per my other mail, I think adding an AMV option at this time is > inadvisable. I could go either way on removing or keeping the > is_scannable function --- anybody else have an opinion on that point? > > Which of us is going to commit this? We're running low on time ... As a my two cents, I have been watching this thread and the concern on timeline is bothering me. I fully understand our want to get into Beta and I know we don't want to slip schedule too much but quality is important. It is what makes our project what it is more than any other value we hold. I also know we already slipped the beta once but we are not a corporation, we do not have shareholders and nobody can fire us. If we need to push it again for quality, shouldn't we? Sincerely, JD
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: