Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report

On 05/05/2013 05:16 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us 
> <mailto:bruce@momjian.us>> wrote:
>
>     On Thu, May  2, 2013 at 03:03:58PM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
>     > Some suggestions, perhaps just based on my preference for verbosity:
>     >
>     >
>     >        <para>
>     >         Add cache of local locks (Jeff Janes)
>     >        </para>
>     >
>     >        <para>
>     >         This speeds lock release at statement completion in
>     transactions
>     >         that hold many locks; it is particularly useful for pg_dump.
>     >        </para>
>     >
>     >
>     > I think this is equally important for restoration of dumps, if
>     the restoration
>     > is run all in one transaction.  (Making the dump and restoring
>     it have similar
>     > locking and unlocking patterns)
>
>     Do you have proposed wording?  I can't say just dump/restore as it
>     only
>     helps with _logical_ dump and _logical_ restore, and we don't have a
>     clear word for logical restore, as it could be pg_restore or piped
>     into
>     psql.  We could do:
>
>             that hold many locks; it is particularly useful for
>     pg_dump and restore.
>
>     but "restore" seems very vague.
>
>
>
> Yeah, I wasn't sure about how to work that either.
>
> "...and the restore of such dumps."?
>

s/restore/restoration/

cheers

andrew