Re: OK to put temp tablespace on volatile storage or to omit it from backups?
От | Darren Duncan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: OK to put temp tablespace on volatile storage or to omit it from backups? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51808565.8070806@darrenduncan.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: OK to put temp tablespace on volatile storage or to omit it from backups? (Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 2013.04.30 7:14 PM, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote: > 2013/5/1 Yang Zhang <yanghatespam@gmail.com>: > >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Darren Duncan <darren@darrenduncan.net> wrote: >>> On 2013.04.30 4:55 PM, Yang Zhang wrote: >>>> >>>> I would intuit that it's fine, but I just want to make sure there are >>>> no gotchas from a recovery point of view: >>>> >>>> If I were to lose my temp tablespace upon system crash, would this >>>> prevent proper crash recovery? >>>> >>>> Also, if I were to omit the temp tablespace from the base backup, >>>> would that prevent proper backup recovery? >>> >>> >>> Although it would be nice if what you said would work, I read in a recent >>> blog post that losing any tablespace would prevent the database server from >>> starting, even if it was only for temporary things. -- Darren Duncan >> >> That is unfortunate. Good thing I asked, I guess. Do you have a >> pointer to said blog post? > > I think this is the post in question: > > http://thebuild.com/blog/2013/03/10/you-cannot-recover-from-the-loss-of-a-tablespace/ Yes, that looks like it. -- Darren Duncan
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: