Re: Allowing parallel pg_restore from pipe
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Allowing parallel pg_restore from pipe |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5178373F.6090604@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Allowing parallel pg_restore from pipe (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: Allowing parallel pg_restore from pipe
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/24/2013 03:40 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> On 04/23/2013 07:53 PM, Timothy Garnett wrote: >>> Anyways, the question is if people think this is generally useful. If so >>> I can clean up the preferred choice a bit and rebase it off of master, >>> etc. > I find this idea very useful yes. > > Another idea would be to allow for parallel pg_dump output to somehow be > piped into a parallel pg_restore. I don't know how to solve that at all, > it just sound something worthy of doing too. > That's not going to work, the output from parallel pg_dump is inherently multiple streams. That's why it ONLY supports directory format, and not even custom format on disk, let alone a pipe. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: