Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: more anti-postgresql FUD |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5175.1160506244@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: more anti-postgresql FUD (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
Re: more anti-postgresql FUD Re: more anti-postgresql FUD Re: more anti-postgresql FUD |
Список | pgsql-general |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: >> * MySQL is used as a primary development platform. > Another good reason. Actually that's *the* reason --- it's always going to be hard for Postgres to look good for an application that's been designed/optimized for MySQL. The application has already made whatever compromises it had to for that platform, and dropping it onto a different DB won't magically undo them. Some days I think database independence is a myth. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: