Re: pg_dump selectively ignores extension configuration tables
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump selectively ignores extension configuration tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5160B48F.3040306@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump selectively ignores extension configuration tables (Vibhor Kumar <vibhor.kumar@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/04/2013 01:03 PM, Vibhor Kumar wrote: > I did some testing on this patch with 9.1 and 9.2 source code. Testing included following: > 1. Configured PostGIS with 9.1 and 9.2 > 2. verified all switches of pg_dump with regression db. > 3. Checked other extensions, to verify if this impacting those. > > Everything is working as expected and I haven't found any issue during my test with this patch. Thanks Vibhor. Any other comments or concerns before I commit this? > While testing this patch, some thoughts came in my mind and thought to share on this thread. > Is it possible, if we can have two switches for extension in pg_dump: > 1. extension dump with user data in extension tables. > 2. User data-only dump from extensions. This might be worth considering for 9.4 Thanks, Joe -- Joe Conway credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: