Re: [PATCH] Exorcise "zero-dimensional" arrays (Was: Re: Should array_length() Return NULL)

<div class="moz-cite-prefix">2013-04-03 20:58 keltezéssel, Gavin Flower írta:<br /></div><blockquote
cite="mid:515C7BC1.5050507@archidevsys.co.nz"type="cite"><div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 04/04/13 05:36, David E.
Wheelerwrote:<br /></div><blockquote cite="mid:EE62F5DD-16EB-46C7-AD72-9743619E7650@kineticode.com" type="cite"><pre
wrap="">OnApr 3, 2013, at 9:30 AM, Tom Lane <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us"
moz-do-not-send="true"><tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us></a>wrote:
 

</pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">Fortran ... Basic ... actually I'd have thought that zero was a
minority position.  Fashions change I guess.
</pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">I say we turn the default lower bound up to 11.

David


</pre></blockquote><font size="-1">In keeping with the level of irrationality in this thread, ma<font size="-1">ybe we
shouldset it to an irrational number like the square root of 2, or transcend our selves and make in </font></font>a
transcendentalnumber like pi!  :-)<br /><br /> I suppose using the square root of minus one would be consider too
imaginative??? :-)<br /></blockquote><br /> Nah, that would make arrays have 2 dimensions as a minimum... :-)<br /><br
/><blockquotecite="mid:515C7BC1.5050507@archidevsys.co.nz" type="cite"><br /><br /> Cheers,<br /> Gavin<br
/></blockquote><br/><br /><pre class="moz-signature" cols="90">-- 
 
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.postgresql-support.de">http://www.postgresql-support.de</a>
<aclass="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.postgresql.at/">http://www.postgresql.at/</a>
 
</pre>