Re: function source
От | Wright, George |
---|---|
Тема | Re: function source |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51548D6D5BEB57468163194A8C1A0E98C6BE62@MAGPTCPEXC02.na.mag-ias.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: function source ("Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej.groups@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: function source
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
For intel. Prop. Reasons, I don't want the source for the functions to be visible. The functions I've written are plpgsql and if I do \df+ <function> it displays the fully readable entire source. -----Original Message----- From: Andrej Ricnik-Bay [mailto:andrej.groups@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 12:57 PM To: Wright, George Cc: pgsql-novice@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [NOVICE] function source On 12/07/2008, Wright, George <George.Wright@infimatic.com> wrote: > So does that mean there is no way to hide the source for procedural > language functions in postgresql? Let's say it's not easy to just "read" the definition ... one can go and use a disassembler to see what your procedure does if one feels the urge (and is good with assembler). The question is also: "whom do you want to stop from seeing them?" -- Please don't top post, and don't use HTML e-Mail :} Make your quotes concise. http://www.american.edu/econ/notes/htmlmail.htm
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: