Re: function source
От | Wright, George |
---|---|
Тема | Re: function source |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51548D6D5BEB57468163194A8C1A0E98C6BE59@MAGPTCPEXC02.na.mag-ias.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: function source (Mark Roberts <mailing_lists@pandapocket.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: function source
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
So does that mean there is no way to hide the source for procedural language functions in postgresql? -----Original Message----- From: Mark Roberts [mailto:mailing_lists@pandapocket.com] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 12:34 PM To: Wright, George Cc: pgsql-novice@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [NOVICE] function source I think that we have some functions that are defined in C. I'd have to check the repository to get the source. -Mark On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 10:47 -0500, Wright, George wrote: > Is there a way to hide/encrypt the source for functions I might write > in any of the procedural languages? > > > > Doing \df+ <func> shows all of it. > >
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: